# Overview

We will learn how to estimate BLUE (best linear unbiased estimators) and BLUP (best linear unbiased predictors) simultaneously.

Use the function load() to load the phenotype object dat_day17.Rda, the OLS fit object fit_day17.Rda, the numerator relationship matrix A2.Rda, the genotype matrix W.Rda, the results from pedigree-based BLUP day18.Rda, and the results from genomic BLUP day20.Rda we created in class.

load(file.choose())  # dat_day17.Rda
dim(dat)
summary(fit)
dim(A2)
dim(W)

ls()

# Statistical model

The statistical model we will fit is given by \begin{align*} \mathbf{y} &= \mathbf{X}\mathbf{b} + \mathbf{Z}\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{e} \\ \mathbf{u} & \sim MVN(0, \mathbf{K}\sigma^2_K) \\ \mathbf{e} & \sim MVN(0, \mathbf{I}\sigma^2_e) \\ \end{align*} where $$\mathbf{y}$$ is the vector of birth weights, $$\mathbf{X}$$ and $$\mathbf{Z}$$ are incident matrices for fixed and random effects, respectively, $$\mathbf{b}$$ is the vector of regression coefficients for fixed effects, $$\mathbf{u}$$ is the vector of regression coefficients for random genetic values, $$\mathbf{K}$$ is the relationship matrix either takes the $$\mathbf{A}$$ or the $$\mathbf{G}$$ matrix, and $$\mathbf{e}$$ is the vector of residuals.

Henderson (1949; 1950; 1959; 1963; 1975) (e.g., doi: 10.2307/2529430) maximized the joint distribution of phenotype $$\mathbf{y}$$ and random effect $$\mathbf{u}$$ to derive mixed model equations (MME). \begin{align} \begin{bmatrix} \mathbf{X'X} & \mathbf{X'Z} \\ \mathbf{Z'X} & \mathbf{Z'Z} + \mathbf{K}^{-1} \lambda \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \hat{\mathbf{b}} \\ \hat{\mathbf{u}} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \mathbf{X'y} \\ \mathbf{Z'y} \end{bmatrix} \end{align} where $$\lambda$$ is the ratio of variance components $$\frac{\sigma^2_e}{\sigma^2_A}$$ or $$\frac{\sigma^2_e}{\sigma^2_G}$$.

Henderson later showed that $$\hat{\mathbf{b}}$$ from the above equation is a solution for generalized least square estimate and linear combination of $$\hat{\mathbf{b}}$$ and $$\hat{\mathbf{u}}$$ is BLUP. Thus, we can obtain BLUE of $$\hat{\mathbf{b}}$$ and BLUP of $$\hat{\mathbf{u}}$$ simultaneously by solveing MME. \begin{align} \begin{bmatrix} \hat{\mathbf{b}} \\ \hat{\mathbf{u}} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \mathbf{X'X} & \mathbf{X'Z} \\ \mathbf{Z'X} & \mathbf{Z'Z} + \mathbf{K}^{-1} \lambda \end{bmatrix}^{-1} \begin{bmatrix} \mathbf{X'y} \\ \mathbf{Z'y} \end{bmatrix} \end{align}

# Mixed model equations

The function computeMME() accepts the vector of phenotypes ($$\mathbf{y}$$), the incidence matrix for fixed effects ($$\mathbf{X}$$), the incidence matrix for random effects ($$\mathbf{Z}$$), the numerator relationship matrix ($$\mathbf{A}$$), and the genomic relationship matrix ($$\mathbf{G}$$). The returned values are pedigree-based MME solutions and genome-based MME solutions.

computeMME <- function(y = y, X = X, Z = Z, A = A, G = G) {

X <- model.matrix(~dat2$AgeDam.mon. + dat2$SEX)
Z <- diag(nrow(G))
I <- diag(nrow(G))
G2 <- (1 - 0.001) * G + 0.001 * A

library(regress)
varcompA <- regress(y ~ -1 + X, ~A)
lambdaA <- varcompA$sigma[2]/varcompA$sigma[1]
varcompG <- regress(y ~ -1 + X, ~G2)
lambdaG <- varcompG$sigma[2]/varcompG$sigma[1]

XtX <- crossprod(X)
XtZ <- crossprod(X, Z)
ZtX <- crossprod(Z, X)
ZtZA <- crossprod(Z) + solve(A) * lambdaA
ZtZG <- crossprod(Z) + solve(G2) * lambdaG
Xty <- crossprod(X, y)
Zty <- crossprod(Z, y)
LHS1 <- cbind(XtX, XtZ)
LHS2A <- cbind(ZtX, ZtZA)
LHS2G <- cbind(ZtX, ZtZG)
LHSA <- rbind(LHS1, LHS2A)
LHSG <- rbind(LHS1, LHS2G)
RHS <- rbind(Xty, Zty)

sol.A <- solve(LHSA) %*% RHS
sol.G <- solve(LHSG) %*% RHS
return(list(A = sol.A, G = sol.G))

}

y <- dat$BWT dat2 <- dat[, c("AgeDam.mon.", "SEX")] sol.mme <- computeMME(y = y, X = X, Z = Z, A = A2, G = G) The vectors sol.mme$A and sol.mme$G include MME solutions derived from pedigree and genomics, respectively. The length of vectors is equal to the sum of BLUE and BLUP solutions. length(sol.mme$A)

### Exercise 2

Compare the estimates of EBV and GEBV obtained from PBLUP (uhatA), GBLUP (uhatG), pedigree-based MME (sol.mme$A), and genome-based MME (sol.mme$G). Use the cor() function to calculate correlations.

How EBVs and GEBVs are distributed? The boxplot result below indicates that the $$\mathbf{G}$$ matrix shrinks estimates of breeding values more closer toward zero than those from the $$\mathbf{A}$$ matrix.

boxplot(c(uhatA), sol.mme$A[4:length(sol.mme$A)], c(uhatG), sol.mme$G[4:length(sol.mme$G)],
names = c("PBLUP", "PBLUP.MME", "GBLUP", "GBLUP.MME"), ylab = "Breeding values")

# The regress package

The regress package also estimates BLUE and predicts BLUP. The regress() function estimates variance components and BLUE; the function BLUP predicts breeding values.

library(regress)
varcompA <- regress(y ~ -1 + X, ~A2)
varcompG <- regress(y ~ -1 + X, ~G)

regress.A <- BLUP(varcompA)
regress.G <- BLUP(varcompG)

### Exercise 3

Compare the estimates of fixed effects obtained from the following: OLS, pedigree-based MME, genome-based MME, and the regress package. Use the cor() function to calculate correlations.

Here we add the results from the regress package into the boxplot in order to summarize the distributions of EBVs and GEBVs.

boxplot(c(uhatA), sol.mme$A[4:length(sol.mme$A)], regress.A$Mean, c(uhatG), sol.mme$G[4:length(sol.mme$G)], regress.G$Mean, names = c("PBLUP", "PBLUP.MME",
"regress.A", "GBLUP", "GBLUP.MME", "regress.G"), ylab = "Breeding values")

March 28, 2017